[카테고리:] Investment Principles

  • Why Investors Struggle to Cut Losses: The Hidden Psychology of Break-even Bias


    Investment Principles Learned from Failure #002

    What You’ll Learn in This Article
    Why cutting losses feels almost impossible for the human brain

    The psychological trap behind the Break-even Bias

    Why hope can become a dangerous emotion in investing

    How experienced investors separate emotions from decisions

    Have You Ever Been Unable to Press the Sell Button?
    Imagine your investment is down more than 20%. Days turn into weeks. Then the stock finally begins to rebound. Instead of asking, “What is the market telling me?” many investors ask, “How much longer until I get my money back?”

    That single question changes everything. At that moment, you stop managing risk and start protecting your emotional attachment to the position. Most investors don’t stay trapped because they picked a bad company. They stay trapped because they become anchored to their entry price.

    Why This Happens
    Behavioral finance has studied this phenomenon for decades. Two psychological biases usually work together.

    Loss Aversion
    Human beings naturally feel the pain of losing much more strongly than the pleasure of gaining. Accepting a loss feels like admitting failure. As a result, many investors delay selling even when the evidence says they should.

    Break-even Bias
    Once an investment falls, our average purchase price becomes an emotional anchor. Instead of asking, “Would I buy this stock today?” we ask, “Can I just get back to break even?” The problem is simple: The market doesn’t know your entry price.

    Real Portfolio Example


    Average Cost: 3,634 KRW

    Shares Held: 552

    Rebound High: 2,770 KRW

    Loss at the Time: More than 20%

    Looking back, I realized something important.

    I wasn’t following the market objectively.

    I wasn’t measuring risk properly.

    I was simply waiting for my purchase price to return.

    My average purchase price became more important than the market itself.

    Three Technical Signals I Ignored


    After reviewing the chart objectively, three warning signs became obvious.

    Rising Volume with Weak Momentum: Trading volume increased, but price struggled to continue higher. This suggested that upward momentum was weakening despite increased market participation.

    Major Resistance Zone: The rebound reached a price area where previous investors were likely waiting to sell. Resistance doesn’t guarantee a reversal, but it increases risk.

    No Clear Trend Reversal: The rebound looked encouraging, but there wasn’t enough evidence to conclude that the long-term downtrend had ended. Hope replaced objective analysis.

    The Lesson I Learned
    A losing position is not a problem by itself. The real problem is holding a position without a clear reason. A disciplined investor does not ask, “When will I recover my money?” They ask, “Is this still the best place for my capital today?”

    The market rewards discipline, not emotional attachment.

    Many investors may look at the later price movement and say, “See? Waiting worked.” But investing doesn’t work that way. The stock eventually moved higher. That doesn’t mean ignoring risk was the right decision. Good investment decisions should be judged by the quality of the process—not simply by the final outcome. Because in investing, good decisions sometimes produce bad outcomes, and bad decisions sometimes produce good outcomes. Long-term success depends on consistently following sound principles, not on getting lucky once.

    One Question That Changed My Investing
    Whenever I hesitate, I now ask myself one question: “If I had no position today, would I buy this stock at the current price?” If the answer is No, why am I still holding it? That question removes emotion and forces me to evaluate the investment objectively.

    Quick Self-Check
    Before your next trade, ask yourself:

    □ Am I protecting my capital?

    □ Or am I protecting my ego?

    □ Would I buy this stock today?

    □ Is my decision based on evidence or hope?

    Key Takeaways
    ✔ Your average purchase price has no influence on future market movements.

    ✔ Hope is not an investment strategy.

    ✔ Position sizing and disciplined exits reduce emotional decision-making.

    ✔ Great investors don’t avoid losses. They avoid catastrophic losses.

    Next Episode
    Investment Principles Learned from Failure #003
    How Should You Read Trading Volume?
    Most investors only watch price. Professional investors pay close attention to volume because it can reveal changes in market participation and momentum. Price tells you what happened; volume often tells you why it happened.

    🇰🇷 한국어 요약
    이번 글에서는 투자자들이 손실을 확정하지 못하는 이유인 손실 회피 성향(Loss Aversion)과 본전 심리(Break-even Bias)를 살펴보았습니다. 저는 평단가 3,634원, 보유수량 552주인 종목이 약 2,770원까지 반등했을 당시, 리스크 관리를 다시 검토했어야 했지만 시장보다 평단가에 집착한 나머지 아무런 행동도 하지 못했습니다.

    시간이 지나 주가가 더 상승했다고 해서 당시의 판단이 옳았던 것은 아닙니다. 투자는 결과가 아니라 당시의 정보와 원칙을 기준으로 평가해야 합니다. 이번 경험을 통해 제가 얻은 가장 중요한 원칙은 다음과 같습니다.

    시장은 나의 매수가를 모릅니다.

    하지만 내 감정은 그 숫자에 계속 집착합니다.

    좋은 투자는 최고점에서 매도하는 능력이 아니라, 감정을 통제하고 리스크를 관리하며 시장에서 오래 살아남는 과정입니다.

    Disclaimer

    This article is based on my personal investing experience and is intended for educational purposes only. It should not be considered financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

  • When Should You Reduce Your Stock Position?

    Lessons from a Real Investment Loss About Risk Management | Investment Principles Learned from Failure #001

    Every investor eventually faces the same difficult question:

    Should I keep holding, or should I reduce my position?

    What You’ll Learn in This Article

    • Why position sizing matters more than finding the perfect selling price
    • Three technical signals that suggested it was time to reduce risk
    • How a simple partial exit could have changed the outcome
    • Why protecting your capital is more important than protecting your ego

    Would You Sell… or Wait?

    Imagine your investment is down more than 20%.

    Then the stock finally rebounds.

    Would you sell part of your position?

    Or would you wait until you break even?

    I chose the second option.

    I kept telling myself,

    “Just a little higher… then I’ll sell.”

    That decision became one of the most valuable investing lessons I’ve ever learned.

    Most investors don’t lose money because they can’t pick good stocks.

    They lose because they don’t know when to reduce risk.

    This article analyzes my own trading experience and explains why position sizing may be one of the most underrated skills in investing.

    Why Most Investors Fail at Position Sizing

    Position sizing isn’t about selling everything.

    Nor is it about holding forever.

    It’s about adjusting your exposure as market conditions change.

    Unfortunately, many investors become trapped by one dangerous emotion:

    The Break-even Bias.

    Instead of analyzing the market,

    we begin negotiating with our emotions.

    “I’ll sell once I get my money back.”

    The market doesn’t know your entry price.

    It only reacts to buyers and sellers.

    Real Portfolio Example

    (Insert portfolio screenshot here 실제 계좌 이미지 삽입 ])

    Average Cost: 3,634 KRW

    Shares Held: 552

    Highest Rebound Price: Approximately 2,770 KRW

    Looking back,

    I wasn’t following the chart.

    I wasn’t watching momentum.

    I wasn’t measuring risk.

    I was simply staring at my average purchase price.

    That emotional attachment prevented me from making a rational decision.

    Three Technical Signals I Ignored

    Let’s compare the difference one small decision could have made.

    Real investment portfolio and stock chart showing position sizing analysis

    After reviewing the chart objectively, three signals stood out.

    1. Rising Volume with Weak Price Momentum

    Trading volume increased,

    but price failed to continue making strong advances.

    This suggested that selling pressure might have been increasing.

    1. Price Was Approaching a Major Resistance Zone

    The rebound reached an area where previous investors were likely waiting to sell.

    Resistance zones often become natural places for profit-taking or risk reduction.

    1. No Clear Evidence of a Trend Reversal

    A rebound is not the same as a new uptrend.

    At that time,

    there wasn’t enough evidence to conclude that the long-term trend had changed.

    I allowed hope to replace objective analysis.

    Position sizing comparison between holding all shares and selling 100 shares

    Notice something important.

    This isn’t about selling everything.

    It’s about creating options.

    By reducing only part of the position,

    I could have lowered emotional pressure,

    secured cash,

    and prepared for future opportunities.

    Position sizing doesn’t guarantee higher profits.

    It gives you more flexibility to protect your capital and seize future opportunities.

    The Lesson That Changed My Investing

    Today, I follow one simple investment principle.

    A good exit isn’t about selling at the highest price.

    It’s about reducing unnecessary risk.

    Selling part of a position isn’t admitting defeat.

    It’s giving yourself another chance to make better decisions later.

    Key Takeaways

    • Your average purchase price should never control your decisions.
    • Position sizing helps reduce emotional trading.
    • Partial selling creates flexibility for future opportunities.
    • Capital preservation always comes before profit maximization.

    Quick Self-Check

    1. Before making your next investment decision, ask yourself:
    2. Am I following the market or my emotions?
    3. Is this rebound supported by volume?
    4. Am I approaching a resistance level?
    5. Do I already have a position-sizing plan?

    Next Episode

    Investment Principles Learned from Failure #002

    Why Investors Can’t Cut Their Losses

    We’ll explore why the desire to “break even” often keeps investors trapped in losing positions far longer than they should.

    Question for Readers

    Have you ever held onto a losing position simply because you wanted to get your money back?

    Did waiting help…

    or make things worse?

    Share your experience in the comments.

    Investment Principles Learned from Failure

    001 Position Sizing

    Remember

    • ✔ Don’t chase the perfect exit.
    • ✔ Reduce risk before the market forces you to.
    • ✔ Position sizing isn’t weakness. It’s one of the strongest forms of risk management.

    It’s one of the strongest forms of risk management.

    🇰🇷 한국어 요약

    이번 글에서는 실제 투자 경험을 바탕으로 비중조절(Position Sizing) 의 중요성을 살펴보았습니다.

    저는 평단가 3,634원, 552주를 보유한 상태에서 약 2,770원까지 반등했지만, “조금만 더 오르면 팔겠다”는 본전 심리 때문에 비중을 줄이지 못했습니다.

    차트를 다시 분석해 보니,

    • 거래량 증가에도 상승 탄력이 둔화되었고,
    • 이전 매물대 저항에 접근했으며,
    • 추세 전환을 확신할 근거는 부족했습니다.

    만약 100주만이라도 매도했다면, 현금을 확보하고 다음 기회를 준비할 수 있었을 것입니다.

    이번 경험을 통해 제가 얻은 가장 중요한 원칙은 다음과 같습니다.

    좋은 매도는 최고가를 맞히는 것이 아니라, 리스크를 줄이는 것입니다.

    Disclaimer

    This article is based on my personal investing experience and is intended for educational purposes only.

    It should not be considered financial or investment advice.

    Always conduct your own research and consider your financial situation before making investment decisions.

      Thank you for reading.

      See you in Investment Principles Learned from Failure #002.